Opinion:
Mondozai
The Moto E is primarily aimed at markets like India, where even an extra 10 dollars MSRP can make or break a purchase.
LTE in such markets make no sense. Most of them don't even have LTE except for in a few token spots in the largest cities if even that.
It's still not even a 720p screen. The Huawei Holly is a whopping $50 dollars cheaper, it has 720p and 3G, which is most relevant. Oh, did I mention it's $50 dollars cheaper? The Moto E 2015 is far too overpriced for its market segment. Even the Xiaomi Redmi Note is on a similar scale.
In Indian currency, the 150 dollars is about 10K rupees, which is where the Mi Note is. Which has 4G(if you really must have it) and a 720p 5.5 inch screen and over 3000 mAh battery life. Why would you get a phone like the Moto E for the same price with less battery life, crappier screen, smaller screen and no distinct advantage?
There are many other examples of low-budget phones which are better. Motorola gotta step it up.
